UMass Lowell Connector Logo

The embarrassment of Chris Kempczinski and the decline of fast food

(Photo courtesy of msn.org) “After McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski went viral for his Big Arch taste test, other fast-food executives decided to join in on the fun.

Aaron Preziosi
Connector Editor

By now everyone has seen the video of McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski trying the new Big Arch sandwich, if one could even call the miniscule morsel he extracted from what might pass as a burger a “bite.” This spawned many reaction videos and clapbacks from other CEOs from companies such as Burger King and Costco, flaming Kempczinski for his hesitance to partake of the food his company creates, as if he silently admitted that it’s barely food at all and shouldn’t be eaten. However, the imagery of the CEO of one of the oldest, most well-known fast food chains in the world refusing to enjoy the food his company creates and referring to a sandwich as a “product” bummed me out and got me thinking about how fast food has changed in the past few years. 

What the hell is going on? Sure, fast food was never regarded for its high quality or nutritional value, but it was fast, as well as cheap and consistent. When I worked for McDonald’s in high school, the two-cheeseburger, drink and fry combo was nine dollars. Maybe ten, if you got a large. When I went just the other day, it was thirteen dollars! I could go to Pressed in Chelmsford or something and get an amazing gourmet sandwich for a similar price, so what’s the point of spending that on crappy beef patties, cheap buns and fake cheese with a side of old and stale or soggy fries, especially when you have to pull over and wait half the time? 

The same thing has been happening in other places, too. “High end” places such as Chipotle have been suffering similarly as well. You end up spending fourteen to fifteen bucks per person, and they barely give you any meat. Once again, I could go to Mexica in Billerica or Tewksbury for the same price and end up getting a larger bowl or burrito with similar but higher quality ingredients. Plus, they have churros. 

I think the decline in fast-food marks a shift in our culture, to be honest. We shouldn’t be eating out of the hands of these enormous corporations who see what they make as “products” rather than food, and wouldn’t be caught dead eating those products themselves, especially since they can no longer beat other restaurants when it comes to price. There’s so many small, independent restaurants or even good chains in our communities and its high time they get the business they deserve. They’re led by average people with a real passion for feeding people, not businesspeople who would rather maximize profits and cut costs. 

Here’s some of my favorite places. Give them your money instead of someone who won’t even eat his own sandwich: 

Mexica Burrito Grill (Billerica and Tewksbury): Build-your-own burrito place. It’s like chipotle, but fresher and smaller. They offer burritos, bowls, tacos and nachos, and they have drinks and desserts too. The churros are amazing. They even have alcohol at the Tewksbury location. 

Pressed (Chelmsford): Sandwich, coffee and juice café. This place is great. The atmosphere is nice, there’s plenty of seats and the food comes out fast. The drinks are pricey, but they are also delicious, and they have take-home pastries, drinks and side dishes too. They also have a drive-thru. 

Augusta’s (Billerica): Sub shop known for their chicken bites. You’ve probably heard of this place, and for good reasons. While their prices have gone up recently due to their expanding business, they have the portions to back it up. They load their sandwiches up high and if you order the chicken bites they absolutely pack the box full. 

Taqueria Sabor Chilango (Billerica): This is a smaller, family-owned taqueria with a great menu. They’ve got all kinds of authentic Mexico City street foods, and even offerings like lengua and chorizo. Absolutely worth visiting. 

Cobblestones (Lowell): Right down the street from North Campus, this place has great American offerings like steaks, burgers and seafood. My personal favorite dish has to be their take on Chicken Marsala. The sauce is rich and velvety, but not too thick or overseasoned, and the chicken is always tender and lightly breaded. The pasta comes out perfectly al dente as well. 

So please, with all of this in mind, go try some good food in your local neighborhood and stop giving fast food restaurants your money. 

The messages we absorb: misogyny in media and its wider impact 

(Photo courtesy of bostonglobe) “The shameless retooling of Kevin Can Wait”

Amy Lam
Connector Staff

Imagine a husband in the kitchen wearing an apron and rubber gloves to clean the house and watch their children for a day which ends in a disaster. The husband cannot cook, feed his children, or wash the dishes properly. These montages are accompanied by a laughing track seeing as he is incompetent at these basic tasks. When the wife returns home, she picks up after his mess calling him out on not helping out with the responsibilities. Adding a laughing track to the scene, downplays the seriousness and opinion of women adding to the subtle sexism within the media.  

It isn’t the only scenario where men are praised for their crude behaviors towards women. This can be seen in sitcoms such as “The Big Bang Theory,” “Kevin Can Wait,” “Modern Family,” and “The Neighborhood,” More prominently, reality shows also express the same misogynistic sentiment as in “Love Is Blind,” “The Bachelor,” and “Too Hot to Handle,” In movies, “Bad Moms” and “Don’t Worry Darling” also show examples of this. Another source prompting these misogynistic ideals is through exposing young men to right-wing podcasts where the “traditional” standards are valued.  

The UK’s televised show “Kevin Can Wait,” criticizes sitcoms where the laugh track is a pivotal device in the stark realities as seen through the lens of the character Kevin and Allison. Kevin does many shenanigans much to the dismay of Allison. In his point of view, the scenes are bright, and the laugh track makes Allison, the nagging and frustrated wife, the joke dismissing her entirely. The switch to Allison’s point of view changes the scene to a darker tone, where she expresses her resentment alone in a separate room. If shows remove the laughing track or music to set the scene like in “Kevin Can Wait,” it would change the context of them entirely by displaying the true nature of sexism without it being sugarcoated. Other media normalizes these behaviors in men causing a culture of toxic masculinity that harms not only women but men’s development as well.  

Despite numerous misogynistic shows, there are shows where there is a healthy balance between partners on how to share responsibilities. Examples of this are Jake Peralta and Amy Santiago in “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” where they had clear communication and respected each other without anyone being the punchline. Unlike the characters in the previous lists, Jake cooks, cleans, and supports Amy without her need to notice his “help” with praise or a reward. It is something that is expected of them both, an equal partnership without a hierarchy between them. The TV series “Ted Lasso” is also another great example of healthy masculinity. It shows that men are allowed to be vulnerable, empathetic, and supportive without keeping their emotions in to look tough, addressing the loneliness felt.  

When I came across a YouTube short showing me several sitcoms where the women are the punchline for being efficient at domestic work while the men were applauded for their incompetence, it becomes difficult to empathize with any actors and actresses who perform in those roles as I would get heated. They continued to pop up on my feed, ever since. Consuming the media was stressful, I would read the comments and get angry while attempting to see what’s so funny and attract people to these shows where sexism is a common trope. 

 I wanted to know. The subtle and not so subtle tones of these shows were always popular compared to shows where healthier relationships aren’t highlighted as much. Dismantling the toxic masculinity culture is a must when it comes to the media. I’m tired of seeing the same message shoved in our throats about traditional values when partnership should be promoted because it is about standing on equal ground and knowing that there is a bond with a partner that is based on trust. This is where the media should move to portray healthier relationships for young girls and boys alike.   

 

 

Hockey column: thoughts on surging Fleet, Merrimack’s Hockey East title and more

(Photo courtesy of PWHL) “The Tsongas Center was sold out for last Saturday’s Boston Fleet game”

Jason Cooke
Connector Editor

The Boston Fleet looks like a playoff contender as the Professional Women’s Hockey League team enters the homestretch of the season.

Currently tied with the Minnesota Frost for first place (42 points), Boston has positioned itself in a good place with nine games left in the docket.

No team has officially clinched a playoff berth just yet — Minnesota, Boston and Montreal are in a three-team push for first — but the Fleet have all the makings of returning to the playoffs after missing the postseason last year.

The Fleet (10-5-2-4) has checked a lot of boxes this season. Aerin Frankel, who earned her PWHL record fifth shutout this season on Saturday, is considered the best goalie in the league. Boston wins at home. Its penalty kill (90.7%) has been dynamite. One minor detail the team will need to ponder down the stretch of the season?

Managing Megan Keller and Haley Winn. It’s no surprise the Fleet go as both of their primary defenders go. Keller (6-10-16) and Winn (3-9-12) drive play. They make things happen, and Boston is practically unbeatable when they are at the top of their game.

The problem? Boston can’t afford to mismanage their franchise defenders. Winn (27:58) and Keller (27:21) average the most time on ice on the team, by far. The next player with the most minutes is Alina Müller, nearly seven minutes less (20:59).

Head coach Kris Sparre has recently talked about the importance of managing their ice time.

Sparre elected to split up his top pairing of Keller and Winn for chunks of Saturday’s game to balance out his defensive core, he said. While the stalwarts still shared the ice for power plays and offensive zone faceoffs, Keller was seen skating with Riley Brengman, while Winn spent time sharing the ice with Daniela Pejšová.

Sparre’s attempt seemed to work. Keller (assist) and Winn (goal, assist) were very productive in the team’s 3-0 win. Something to keep an eye on.

Merrimack reigns supreme

All of Hockey East had its eyes glued to the television on Saturday night, as No. 8 Merrimack took down No. 3 UConn in the Hockey East finals at TD Garden.

The Warriors, winning by way of 2-1, became the first No. 8 seed to win the title. It’s a special moment for the North Andover school in a world where the college landscape tends to favor the big-name schools like Boston College and Boston University who are able to attract blue-chip prospects like James Hagens and Cole Hutson, among others.

Merrimack is a small school — Lawler arena holds some 2,500 fans — and its roster is built on the perfect combination of skill and grit.

And stick taps to netminder Max Lundgren, who made 49 — yes, 49 — saves on Saturday.

Shutdown Swayman

This is why Jeremy Swayman got the big bucks, folks.

Making 41 saves in Saturday’s crucial 4-2 win over the Detroit Red Wings on the road, Swayman perhaps played the best game of his season to date to give the Bruins an important two points in what is a crowded playoff picture in the Eastern Conference.

As of Saturday night’s victory, the Bruins (86 points) hold the first wild card spot in the Eastern Conference in a race where just eight points separate six teams.

That’s how timely Swayman’s efforts were on Saturday, and it’s another indicator that the $66 million Swayman is a big-game player. It wasn’t that long ago when he took the league by storm with a .933 save percentage in an impressive 12-game playoff run in 2024, particularly against the Toronto Maple Leafs.

He’s arguably been the best goalie in the NHL this season — his .908 save percentage is the fourth-best in the league — and he’s beginning to play his best hockey at the most important time.

Frankel makes history for Boston Fleet

(Photo courtesy of PWHL) “Abby Newhook scored a goal in Boston’s 3-0 win over the Seattle Torrent”

Jason Cooke
Connector Editor

LOWELL — Aerin Frankel made history on Saturday night at the Tsongas Center.

Recording her fifth shutout of the season, the Boston Fleet’s star goalie set a Professional Women’s Hockey League record for most shutouts in a season.

Frankel stopped all 21 shots she faced in the team’s 3-0 blanking over the Seattle Torrent in front of a capacity crowd of 6,164 fans in Lowell. Frankel leads the league with wins (14) and is the backbone of the first-place Fleet, which shares the top spot in the league standings with the Minnesota Frost (42 points).

Scoring goals for Boston in the victory were Abby Newhook, Susanna Tapani and Haley Winn.

The race for a playoff spot is shaping up to be very tight. The Fleet (10-5-2-4) plays four of its nine remaining games at the Tsongas, including a battle with the Vancouver Goldeneyes on Tuesday (7 p.m.). Boston has yet to lose a game at the Tsongas Center this season (3-1-0-0).

“It was probably our most complete game that we’ve played since the break,” Fleet head coach Kris Sparre said following Saturday’s win. “I really liked a lot of parts of that game from start to finish and obviously, it was great to see the puck go in the net more than once.”

The Fleet was shut out for the first time of the season last week in a 2-0 loss to the Toronto Sceptres and bounced back in a major way, albeit against the last-place Torrent who are without franchise fixtures Hannah Bilka and Hilary Knight due to injury.

Boston was nearly perfect in all aspects of Saturday’s game. The Fleet outshot Seattle 33-21 and held a territorial advantage for most of the game. It scored first and was a perfect 4-for-4 on the penalty kill to keep Seattle at bay in the first period.

“I thought our opening shift was really good,” said Torrent head coach Steve O’Rourke. “We know we’re having some challenges scoring goals here and we could have gotten that first one off the hop there. I think it just kind of sets the tone and we got out of that first period even. It’s a challenge and we had some looks, but going up against a goaltender of that caliber is challenging.”

Newhook’s goal, which came at 8:06 of the first period to give Boston a quick 1-0 lead, was picture-perfect and epitomized what Boston is trying to do to score more goals.

Instead of dumping the puck in the zone for a retrieval on the forecheck, Newhook entered the attacking zone with patience before sliding the puck to a driving Megan Keller below the goal line. Keller skated with the puck around the net before finding Newhook in the slot for a one-timer.

“One of the focuses for us tonight was we certainly want to play behind other teams,” Sparre said. “We want to put pucks in and chip them and wear them down with our forecheck, but also we don’t want to handcuff our players. We want them to feel like they can make plays out there. So our focus tonight was, ‘Let’s make some hockey plays.’”

Newhook and Keller — two of Boston’s more talented playmakers — put that sentiment on full display in the sequence. Newhook’s sixth goal of the season leads all Boston rookies, while Keller’s assist marked a new career-high in points (6-10-16).

“I think we’ve been dumping the puck in a lot recently and using our forecheck to our advantage, but this game we wanted to focus more on possessing the puck and making plays under pressure,” Newhook said. “So the play kind of opened up, and I saw Keller going down the wall, so I made the play down to her and tried to find a seam, and she made a great pass to me in front of the net.”

Tapani and Winn scored goals in the third period to put the finishing touches on a de facto homecoming to Lowell. Boston’s last game at the Tsongas Center was on Jan. 28 before the Olympic break.

UMass Lowell College Democrats lobby for bills in Washington D.C.

(Photo courtesy of Office of Congresswoman Lori Trahan/Emily Lindtveit) The UMass Lowell College Democrats with Representative Lori Trahan

Emily Lindtveit
Connector Staff

March 6, 2026, was a snowy one for those up in Lowell, but for a small group of students, this day offered something a little more political; lobbying at the U.S. capital. From March 5 to March 8, the UMass Lowell College Democrats took a group of students to Washington D.C. for the first national lobby day. While not the first lobby day any group at UMass Lowell has participated in, this was the first coordinated trip to the nation’s capital and included other universities including Clark University and Catholic University of America. There were a total of 40 students from UMass Lowell, plus another 10 from Clark University. UMass Lowell students lobbied for 5 bills, ranging from a formal recognition of the genocide in Gaza to advocating for grants targeting women and minorities in STEM. The bills had a common theme: issues that young people and working-class people care about.  

This trip wasn’t a spur of the moment thing for this club; it had been in motion for months. “We called over 75 offices [for meetings], fundraised to bring hardworking students an opportunity to learn in our nation’s capital and put the needs of young people on the map” said political Affairs director Matthew Kelly. Although 75 offices were called, 4 offices were visited. The day started off strong with some students starting their day off at Rep. Chellie Pingree’s office, with students focusing their advocacy on veterans’ affairs and representation for women and minorities in STEM. Next was the most exciting meeting of the day with Lowell’s very own representative, Lori Trahan. Students were able to meet with her directly to advocate for their bills.  

Representative Trahan spoke candidly with students about her experience in Congress and gave students insight into how the process of fighting bills operates. Students spoke about their opposition to the Iran war, the need for qualified immunity for law enforcement and personal experiences related to being in the STEM field. Afterwards, the full group of UMass Lowell students were able to meet with Senator Ed Markey’s office. This meeting gave the majority of students to talk, since there was enough time to go over all the bills, and advocate for similar resolutions to be introduced into the Senate. Finally, the Dems met with the youngest member of congress, Representative Maxwell Frost and were able to see themselves represented in congress.  

The trip was offering more than lobbying; it was offering a chance for students to step into the role of self-advocates. “We were given the opportunity to lobby for bills we truly care about, while also utilizing our communication skills in professional meetings and settings with well-respected political representatives,” said junior Hailegh Harris, who was not a member of the chapter before taking the trip. The bills discussed focusing on the community are what drove a lot of interest. Kelly talked about his pride in the efforts the general body put into this saying “Our club conducted ourselves in the way that national democrats should all around the country; unapologetic about working class issues…a change was made because of our general body’s dedication to the community.”

Massachusetts votes to redesign state flag

(Photo courtesy of Benjamin Heffner) “Dome of the Massachusetts State House”

Alejandro Carter

Connector Contributor

The official state emblems of Massachusetts are up for redesign as the Massachusetts Seal, Flag, and Motto Advisory Commission enters round 3 of the decision making process. Beginning in 2024, but influenced by decades of controversy, the Massachusetts state flag, seal, and motto are being redesigned for the modern era.

The call for a redesign comes after decades of public outcry over the outdated and offensive symbolism present within the state’s current flag and seal, which date to 1908. The current seal, which is present on the state flag, features a Native American with a dangling sword held by an arm above. The state’s motto “By the sword we seek peace, but peace only under liberty” (translated from Latin) is listed below. The state seal (and by association, flag) reflect the violent and often overlooked history between the Massachusetts colonists and the Native Americans who were living on the grounds that were settled upon. While this violent symbolism is displayed directly on the state flag and seal, many Massachusetts residents have no idea of its meaning. Professor Christoph Strobel, the chair of the UMass Lowell history department and a professor of Native American history says “there’s not much public awareness of [the flag and seal]”, highlighting the lack of knowledge in the Massachusetts public around the symbols’ history. This imagery is exactly what the committee for the flag redesign seeks to address and change.

State flags are something which simply do not receive much attention by the public, usually only ever being flown outside of statehouses and other government facilities. Therefore, it is not unlikely for many to be unaware of what their flag means, or how it looks entirely. Strobel says “I give a lot of public talks [on] New England indigenous history […] [and] the seal is often something that I start out with, and people are just like ‘woah, this is all in there?’”. Strobel’s commentary gives light to an issue that many Massachusetts residents are unaware of, that being their lack of knowledge about the history around the Massachusetts Bay Colony and its violent encounters with Native American groups. When asked about college students’ knowledge about the flag, Christian Boucher, a history major and member of the UMass Lowell History Club says “maybe a couple” of students are aware of the history. Reflecting Boucher’s sentiments, Strobel believes that only “a small number” of the general Massachusetts public truly know the history displayed on their state flag.

While the committee for the redesign of the state symbols began in 2024, the official process is still underway. When asked about the flag redesign, Boucher affirms “I’m sure people are aware that it’s going to be changed”. However, there has not been much publicity regarding the redesign process, and it has been almost 2 years since the committee’s creation. At this point in time, there are three finalists for each category, those categories being the flag, the seal, and the state motto. Hearings were held across Massachusetts to receive public input on which designs should be considered for the new state icons. At this time, three finalists have been selected for each category.

Public disapproval of the current Massachusetts state flag has been growing for decades. Stobel recounts that as early as the 90s, there have been talks throughout the state to redesign the flag. Reflecting this decades-long battle for the removal of offensive imagery, In 1989 the Massachusetts Turnpike logo, which depicted a pilgrim’s hat with an arrow going through it, was redesigned to be just a pilgrim’s hat. This change reflects a sentiment throughout the general public to redesign the state’s icons, many of which feature offensive imagery.

The redesign surrounding the flag highlights a larger trend in the United States in recent years. A few states now have come forward and redesigned their flags, either to remove offensive imagery or simply to give a fresh take on previously disliked designs. Most notably, Mississippi voted to redesign its flag, which featured the Battle Flag of the Confederate States of America in the top left corner. In June 2020, the newly selected flag was voted in, removing the original design and implementing a new design featuring the state’s official flower. Other states have followed suit, such as Utah in March 2024 and Minnesota in May 2024. Nick Londono, a New Hampshire resident and student at UMass Lowell, says that “if [any state’s flag] is controversial, it should definitely be changed. Especially if [the original design] comes at the cost of another group”. While not every flag changed has featured controversial symbolism, this shift of states redesigning their emblems is indicative of a broader trend in the United States. Offensive icons of the past, such as statues of Confederate army generals in the South, have been the subject of public criticism and removal over recent years, as the general public has become more aware of the meaning behind the icons around them. While Strobel agrees that a redesign is in order for the Massachusetts flag, he also believes that “the past is something that’s in the past, and that we should be critically engaging with”. Strobel continues “it’s important to acknowledge [past mistakes] so that you, as a country, or as a people, don’t make the same mistakes that people have in the past”.

The three finalists for the state flag can be found on the Massachusetts official government website at mass.gov, where the current three finalists for the state seal and motto are also listed. The future states’ symbols will be voted upon going forward by the committee, with public opinion also taken into account. Massachusetts residents seeking to submit their feedback on the currently selected designs and selection process are encouraged to do so by contacting the committee at their official email, massflagandsealfeedback@mass.gov.

MassPIRG students lobby for hunger advocacy

(Photo courtesy of Luke Van Horn) “MassPIRG students at Hunger Advocacy event”

Benjamin Heffner

Connector Editor

Students representing campus chapters of the Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group (MassPIRG) gathered at the State House on Mar. 12th to lobby for S.R. 2535 and H.R. 4408, also known as the MA Hunger Free Campus Initiative Act.

The bill, introduced by State Representatives Andy Vargas (D) of the 3rd Essex District and Mindy Domb (D) of the 3rd Hampshire District, and State Senator Joan Lovely (D) of the 2nd Essex District, would provide grants to colleges and universities across Massachusetts to address student food insecurity and hunger.

In addition, a press release from MassPIRG Students added that it would “enroll eligible students in federal nutrition benefits, support partnerships with food pantries, and raise public awareness of food insecurity through anti-stigma campaigns.”

Both bills currently sit in front of the Senate and House Ways & Means committees, respectively. In FY23, $3.7 million was budgeted to solving hunger in higher institutions. By FY26, it went down to $500,000, a 152% decrease. MassPIRG has sought $3 million for FY27.

The initiative has already been put into place in areas including UMass Boston and North Shore and Roxbury Community Colleges, with all three institutions seeing noticeable results.

Among those leading the push for UMass Lowell have been Kayla Kittredge and Vice Chair Luke Van Horn.

Kittredge, a junior double sociology and criminal justice major who previously helped lead the MassPIRG student chapter at Middlesex Community College (MCC), said that free community college education became her ticket to success.

She said, “My mother passed away a few years ago and soon after, I adopted my two youngest siblings. It had been a struggle until I came to MCC and that’s when I knew I found my community.”

Kittredge also added that as one of the wealthiest states in the country, state lawmakers should be dedicating resources to solving student hunger, saying “There should be no reason that 40% of students are out or below the poverty line while trying to better their lives.”

Van Horn, a junior Criminal Justice major with an Economics minor, has been no stranger to MassPIRG, having testified and helped lead several initiatives for UMass Lowell over the years, and says that advocacy has a significant impact on students.

He added, “I have heard repeatedly from senators and representatives whom I have talked to that young voices are incredibly important and that is where the change is made.”

The Massachusetts Hunger-Free Campus Coalition was formed in 2019 as a means of addressing food insecurity in colleges and universities across Massachusetts, led by the Greater Boston Food Bank, Mass Law Reform Institute, and the Food Bank of Western MA.

Its mission has been to advocate for high-need student populations with the help of student voices.

Hunger advocacy is one of the two initiatives pushed by MassPIRG this year, alongside protecting bees and other pollinators from deadly pesticides. MassPIRG also previously lobbied for hunger advocacy last fall.

MassPIRG Students’ next advocacy event will be on March 31 at the State House in favor of ocean regulations.

UMass Lowell opens “One Flea Spare”

Aaliyah Afolabi
Connector Contributor

This March comes a play of intense emotions rooted in fear, survival and desire to the corners of Mahoney Hall. Through March 26-28 at 7:30 p.m. and March 29 at 2 p.m., the Theater Studies Program of UMass Lowell will be presenting Naomi Wallace’s “One Flea Spare.” This play is set in 1665 London’s Great Plague era, where many had to be prisoners in their own homes as a fight for survival against a life-threatening monstrosity. In this play, a wealthy couple with two unexpected intruders must navigate life in a 28-day confinement amidst a city-wide pandemic. This play will demonstrate an exploration of identity when the doors are locked and the outside world starts to spiral.  

Given the social status of the characters, with the couple being aristocrats, socially being seen as the “masters,” and the low-class sailor and young street girl; the intruders socially being seen as the “servants,” there is a switch in this dynamic. Within these few days of confinement, there is a switch in power roles psychologically, rather than societally. With the servants becoming the “mental masters” and the masters becoming the “mental servants.” This inward switch of roles questions the fragile nature of authority. Who are people when mere and unpragmatic titles are stripped away from them? The sailor’s worldly experience in combination with the young girl’s “street-smart” nature from having to navigate life for survival, was far from what the couple could have comprehended. The plague is dangerous, but the real danger stems from how people treat one another when the safety of social mores is gone.   

In the center of the promotional poster, sits a decaying citrus fruit on a velvet sofa. In 1665, the citrus represented wealth, health a global trade. Rotting on the sofa of a luxurious home is a symbolic representation of those in aristocratic positions during the plague. Something that was once sweet and vibrant, being consumed from the inside out. The peeling wallpaper, dusty light and shadows in the background create a sense of shabby chic claustrophobia. The playwright, Naomi Wallace, is known for using physical body as a landscape for political struggle. As the master and servant “somersaults” in their roles, the sofa they sit on and the walls encaging them become symbolisms of a dying era. The decaying citrus is not just some fruit, but a ticking clock. A ticking clock reminding the audience that although the characters are safe from the street, they are trapped with their own expiring secrets. The production of this high caliber creative work is a significant undertaking for the UMass Lowell Theatre studies program. Directed by Tom Coiner, the play serves as a masterclass in ensemble acting. Due to this story being heavily reliant on the friction between its four main characters, the performances must be urgent and intense to maintain the high-stakes atmosphere of a house under siege.  For the university community, this is an opportunity to see a professional-grade drama, without the Boston price tag. “One Flea Spare” is a bold and supreme piece of writing that asks people to critically look at human history and social mores. By bringing the 17th-century to the Comley-Lane Theatre, the department isn’t just putting on a play. but is opening up a conversation about survival, power and the human cost of isolation. Tickets are free and open to the public. As seats are limited, those who are interested in reserving tickets should email shelley_barish@uml.edu.